Comments on: Why no Public Option? http://www.thelatestandloudest.com/2009/08/why-no-public-option/ Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:31:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: chrisrob http://www.thelatestandloudest.com/2009/08/why-no-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-30 chrisrob Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:55:31 +0000 http://www.thelatestandloudest.com/?p=114#comment-30 Not if they want support for their re-elections they won't. We've got enough votes and enough public support to risk "The Blue Dogs", too. Or as I like to call them, just "The Dogs" Not if they want support for their re-elections they won’t.

We’ve got enough votes and enough public support to risk “The Blue Dogs”, too.

Or as I like to call them, just “The Dogs”

]]> By: Big Ty http://www.thelatestandloudest.com/2009/08/why-no-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-29 Big Ty Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:21:18 +0000 http://www.thelatestandloudest.com/?p=114#comment-29 What's the point of trying to obtain a super-majority if you're not going to use it? At this point, I'm thinking "screw bipartisanship... GOP should either lead, follow, or get out of the way." But then, those "Blue Dog" Democrats would throw a monkey wrench into the gears and jam everything up What’s the point of trying to obtain a super-majority if you’re not going to use it? At this point, I’m thinking “screw bipartisanship… GOP should either lead, follow, or get out of the way.” But then, those “Blue Dog” Democrats would throw a monkey wrench into the gears and jam everything up

]]>